Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42245921›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2023

Generalizations of the Jaccard index and Sørensen index for assessing agreement across multiple readers in object detection and instance segmentation in biomedical imaging.

Madeleine S Durkee, Kyle Lleras, Karen Drukker, Junting Ai, Thao Cao, Gabriel Casella, Deepjyoti Ghosh, Marcus R Clark, Maryellen L Giger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Madeleine S DurkeeUniversity of Chicago, Department of Radiology and Committee on Medical Physics, Chicago, Illinois, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0543-074X
Kyle LlerasUniversity of Chicago, Section of Rheumatology and Gwen Knapp Center for Lupus and Immunology Research, Department of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States.
Karen DrukkerUniversity of Chicago, Department of Radiology and Committee on Medical Physics, Chicago, Illinois, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6544-3476
Junting AiUniversity of Chicago, Section of Rheumatology and Gwen Knapp Center for Lupus and Immunology Research, Department of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States.
Thao CaoUniversity of Chicago, Section of Rheumatology and Gwen Knapp Center for Lupus and Immunology Research, Department of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States.
Gabriel CasellaUniversity of Chicago, Section of Rheumatology and Gwen Knapp Center for Lupus and Immunology Research, Department of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States.
Deepjyoti GhoshUniversity of Chicago, Section of Rheumatology and Gwen Knapp Center for Lupus and Immunology Research, Department of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States.ORCID 0009-0002-1793-9201
Marcus R ClarkUniversity of Chicago, Section of Rheumatology and Gwen Knapp Center for Lupus and Immunology Research, Department of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, United States.
Maryellen L GigerUniversity of Chicago, Department of Radiology and Committee on Medical Physics, Chicago, Illinois, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5482-9728

Funding

University of Chicago Autoimmunity Center of ExcellenceU19AI082724 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI WILSON, PATRICK CHRISTOPHER · 2009 to 2023
$7.2M
Intrarenal B cells in acute kidney allograft rejectionR01AI148705 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI CHONG, ANITA S, CLARK, MARCUS RAMSAY · 2020 to 2024
$4.0M
Tertiary Lymphoid Neogenesis in Human Lupus NephritisR01AR055646 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI CLARK, MARCUS RAMSAY · 2008 to 2018
$3.4M
Quantitative Image Analysis for Assessing Response to Breast Cancer TherapyU01CA195564 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI GIGER, MARYELLEN L. · 2015 to 2019
$2.5M
Protected Radiomics Analysis Commons for Deep Learning in Biomedical DiscoveryS10OD025081 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI GIGER, MARYELLEN L. · 2018 to 2018
$339k
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA195564NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI148705NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI082724NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR055646NIH HHS S10 OD025081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significance: Manual annotations are necessary for training supervised learning algorithms for object detection and instance segmentation. These manual annotations are difficult to acquire, noisy, and inconsistent across readers. Aim: The goal of this work is to describe and demonstrate multireader generalizations of the Jaccard and Sørensen indices for object detection and instance segmentation. Approach: The multireader Jaccard and Sørensen indices are described in terms of "calls," "objects," and number of readers. These generalizations reduce to the equations defined by confusion matrix variables in the two-reader case. In a test set of 50 cell microscopy images, we use these generalizations to assess reader variability and compare the performance of an object detection network (Yolov5) and an instance segmentation algorithm (Cellpose2.0) with a group of five human readers using the Mann-Whitney U-test with Bonferroni correction for multiplicity. Results: The multireader generalizations were statistically different from the mean of pairwise comparisons of readers ( Conclusions: Multireader generalizations of the Jaccard and Sørensen indices provide metrics for characterizing the agreement of an arbitrary number of readers on object detection and instance segmentation tasks.

Indexed as

algorithm performancebiomedical imagingreader agreementreader performancesupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID42245921
PMCPMC13233040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.