ReviewCureus2026
Efficacy of Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) and DBT-Informed Interventions for Binge Eating in Adolescents: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Standard treatments for adolescent eating disorders, such as family-based treatment (FBT), may be insufficient for patients presenting with severe emotion dysregulation and co-occurring pathologies. Dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) targets affect regulation and may therefore offer a viable alternative or adjunctive intervention. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of DBT and DBT-informed interventions, including those integrated with FBT, for adolescents with eating disorders characterized by binge eating episodes. A systematic literature search was conducted across four databases in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies were included if they involved adolescents with eating disorders characterized by binge eating who received DBT-based interventions. The primary outcome was change in objective binge episodes (OBEs), while secondary outcomes included body mass index (BMI), purging frequency, and Eating Disorder Examination (EDE) measures. Data were analyzed using random-effects meta-analysis. Six studies comprising 102 adolescents were included. Pooled analysis demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in OBEs from pre- to post-treatment (mean difference [MD] = -2.15, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -3.93 to -0.38, p = 0.018). Significant improvements were also observed in vomiting episodes (MD = -2.04, 95% CI: -2.72 to -1.35, p < 0.001), as well as EDE Questionnaire (EDE-Q) global scores (p < 0.001) and EDE purging subscale scores (p = 0.008). In contrast, no statistically significant change was observed in BMI (p = 0.064). Subgroup analyses indicated that interventions integrating DBT with FBT (MD = -2.60, p = 0.044) and those delivered in partial hospital settings were associated with significant reductions in binge eating, whereas outpatient settings did not reach statistical significance in pooled estimates. Overall, DBT and DBT-informed interventions are associated with significant reductions in binge eating and purging behaviors in adolescents with eating disorders, without producing significant changes in BMI. The integration of DBT with FBT appears particularly promising for complex clinical presentations; however, larger randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings and evaluate long-term efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.