Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42245882›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Postoperative Findings Mimicking Duodenal Leak After Graham Patch Repair: Intact Repair With Retroperitoneal Abscess.

Newton Rahming, Meghana Singh, Stephan Corcho, Taylor Tomko, Frederick Tiesenga

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Newton RahmingSurgery, Caribbean Medical University, Willemstad, CUW.
Meghana SinghMedicine and Surgery, Umm Al Quwain Hospital, Emirates Health Services, Umm Al Quwain, ARE.
Stephan CorchoSurgery, St George's University, St. George's, GRD.
Taylor TomkoSchool of Medicine, American University of Barbados, Bridgetown, BRB.
Frederick TiesengaGeneral Surgery, West Suburban Medical Center, Chicago, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Perforated duodenal ulcers represent a surgical emergency requiring prompt operative intervention. The Graham omental patch is the most commonly performed procedure for emergent repair; however, postoperative findings suggestive of leakage remain a serious concern and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Traditionally, suspected postoperative leaks have prompted early surgical re-exploration due to the risk of peritonitis and sepsis. However, select patients with concerning postoperative findings may be managed successfully with appropriate drainage, decompression, and nutritional support. We present the case of a 79-year-old male patient who was brought to the emergency department with progressive altered mental status and generalized abdominal pain. Imaging revealed findings consistent with a perforated duodenal ulcer, and the patient underwent emergent exploratory laparotomy with Graham patch repair and placement of a Jackson-Pratt drain. During the postoperative period, bilious output from the drain raised concern for a possible duodenal leak. A contrast-enhanced CT scan with enteric (oral) contrast demonstrated contrast entering the drain, prompting surgical re-exploration. Intraoperatively, the previous repair was found to be intact without evidence of active leakage; instead, a retroperitoneal abscess extending along the duodenal sweep was identified and drained. With continued supportive management, including nasogastric decompression, antibiotics, proton-pump inhibitor therapy, and nutritional support via gastrostomy tube, the patient demonstrated progressive clinical improvement. Drain output gradually diminished and ceased, consistent with resolution of the postoperative process. This case highlights that postoperative findings suggestive of duodenal leak may not represent true failure of the primary repair and underscores the importance of correlating radiologic, intraoperative, and clinical findings. Careful assessment and appropriate supportive management may allow for favorable outcomes in selected hemodynamically stable patients following Graham patch repair.

Indexed as

controlled drainageduodenal leakduodenal ulcergraham patch repairpostoperative complicationspontaneous closure

Identifiers

PMID42245882
PMCPMC13232892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.