ArticleCureus2026
Postoperative Findings Mimicking Duodenal Leak After Graham Patch Repair: Intact Repair With Retroperitoneal Abscess.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Perforated duodenal ulcers represent a surgical emergency requiring prompt operative intervention. The Graham omental patch is the most commonly performed procedure for emergent repair; however, postoperative findings suggestive of leakage remain a serious concern and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Traditionally, suspected postoperative leaks have prompted early surgical re-exploration due to the risk of peritonitis and sepsis. However, select patients with concerning postoperative findings may be managed successfully with appropriate drainage, decompression, and nutritional support. We present the case of a 79-year-old male patient who was brought to the emergency department with progressive altered mental status and generalized abdominal pain. Imaging revealed findings consistent with a perforated duodenal ulcer, and the patient underwent emergent exploratory laparotomy with Graham patch repair and placement of a Jackson-Pratt drain. During the postoperative period, bilious output from the drain raised concern for a possible duodenal leak. A contrast-enhanced CT scan with enteric (oral) contrast demonstrated contrast entering the drain, prompting surgical re-exploration. Intraoperatively, the previous repair was found to be intact without evidence of active leakage; instead, a retroperitoneal abscess extending along the duodenal sweep was identified and drained. With continued supportive management, including nasogastric decompression, antibiotics, proton-pump inhibitor therapy, and nutritional support via gastrostomy tube, the patient demonstrated progressive clinical improvement. Drain output gradually diminished and ceased, consistent with resolution of the postoperative process. This case highlights that postoperative findings suggestive of duodenal leak may not represent true failure of the primary repair and underscores the importance of correlating radiologic, intraoperative, and clinical findings. Careful assessment and appropriate supportive management may allow for favorable outcomes in selected hemodynamically stable patients following Graham patch repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.