ReviewCureus2026
Strategies to Reduce the Risk of Rectal Stump Leakage After Hartmann's Procedure: A Structured Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rectal stump leakage (RSL) is a clinically significant complication following Hartmann's procedure, associated with substantial morbidity, prolonged hospital stay, and challenges during subsequent reversal surgery. This study presents a structured narrative review that provides a qualitative synthesis of the available evidence on mechanisms, risk factors, and strategies to reduce the risk of RSL. Given the heterogeneity of the literature, predominantly retrospective study designs, and inconsistent definitions of stump leakage, formal quantitative synthesis was not feasible. Available evidence suggests that RSL is a multifactorial process driven by impaired tissue healing, mechanical stress, technical factors related to stump construction, and an adverse pelvic environment. Reported associations include male sex, low body mass index, short rectal stump length, and prior pelvic radiotherapy, although the strength and consistency of these relationships vary across studies. Preventive strategies, including attention to stump length and placement, optimization of tissue perfusion, and reduction of intraluminal pressure through decompression techniques, may mitigate risk, but robust comparative data remain limited. Many proposed interventions are supported primarily by observational evidence or extrapolation from anastomotic leak literature. This review emphasizes a mechanism-based, risk-informed approach to prevention while clearly distinguishing between factors supported by quantitative signals and those that remain biologically plausible but unproven. Key gaps include the absence of validated risk prediction models, the lack of prospective Hartmann-specific data, and inconsistent outcome definitions. Future research should focus on prospective cohort studies, standardized reporting frameworks, and the development of clinically applicable risk stratification tools to guide intraoperative decision-making and improve outcomes following Hartmann's procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.