ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026
Usefulness of a cuffless blood pressure monitoring wearable device for aerobic exercise to estimate anaerobic threshold in healthy adults.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Validation study on cuffless ambulatory blood pressure monitoring method using bio-impedance, impedance cardiography and electrocardiography.European journal of applied physiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The anaerobic threshold (AT) is an essential indicator of aerobic exercise. However, it is difficult to measure because it requires expensive, spacious equipment and specialized expertise. The double product break point (DPBP) has recently been reported as an alternative indicator of the AT. The purpose of this study was to estimate the usefulness of a cuffless blood pressure monitoring wearable (CBPW) device for determining the AT using the DPBP as an indicator. Methods: Thirteen healthy adults aged 24-30 years underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), and the oxygen uptake (VO Results: Data from the CBPW device enabled the identification of the DPBP in 13 participants. A strong positive correlation was observed between the VO Conclusion: The results indicate that using the CBPW device could enable easier AT estimation without the need for expensive, large equipment, potentially making aerobic exercise more accessible. Conversely, the DPBP measurements obtained with a cuff-based sphygmomanometer showed low agreement with the AT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.