ArticleResearch square2026
Financial Satisfaction in Blended and Nuclear Families: A Dyadic Perspective.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examines financial satisfaction among couples in blended and nuclear families using Waves 8-16 of the RAND Health and Retirement Study (2006-2022). Grounded in Becker's interdependent utility theory and informed by Hamilton's kin selection theory, this study integrates these frameworks to examine how differences in biological and relational ties may shape financial satisfaction within couples. Generalized structural equation models with ordered logistic regression were estimated within an actor-partner interdependence framework to examine both direct associations and cross-partner pathways consistent with interdependent utility. Across 16,050 household-wave observations from 7,421 households, respondents in blended families had 18.7% lower odds of being in a higher financial satisfaction category (OR = .813; 95% CI [.716, .923]) than those in otherwise similar nuclear families, with spouses showing a similar pattern. Mediation analyses revealed an asymmetric pathway: blended family status was negatively associated with spouse financial satisfaction, which, in turn, was associated with lower respondent financial satisfaction, whereas the reverse pathway was not statistically significant. These findings highlight how family structure and cross-partner dynamics shape couples' financial satisfaction and underscore the importance of preference alignment and relational context in financial planning for blended families.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.