ArticleResearch square2026
Cross-population metabolome-wide Mendelian randomization study of prostate cancer risk.
Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer in US men, with Black men experiencing the highest incidence rates and Black and Hispanic men experiencing higher aggressive PCa rates than White men. Metabolomic dysregulation is a cancer hallmark; however, PCa metabolomic epidemiological evidence is heterogeneous and limited in diverse populations. Methods: We conducted a metabolome-wide two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) of PCa risk in African (AFR) and European (EUR) genetic ancestry and Hispanic (HIS) ethnicity populations. MR was performed in each population using serum metabolomic genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics from ARIC (N Results: We identified 61 significant associations representing 50 unique metabolites in population-specific or cross-population analyses, with enrichment for lipids, including polyunsaturated fatty acids. Upon evaluating the strength of evidence, considering sensitivity analyses and the consistency of findings across populations, fourteen metabolites had strong evidence, including three drug-modifiable and six dietary-modifiable metabolites. Five were novel metabolites not previously reported in PCa MR studies, including two identified in AFR-specific associations: lysophospholipid 1-linoleoyl-GPE (18:20) and fatty acid hexadecanedioate, with colocalization suggesting a shared causal variant (rs28864441) between hexadecanedioate and PCa, and three identified in cross-population associations: amino acid 3-methoxytryosine, fatty acid 2-hydroxysterate, and peptide gamma-glutamylleucine. Conclusions: Our findings provide evidence of associations between serum metabolites, particularly fatty acids, and PCa development across populations. The biological mechanisms and clinical utility of these metabolites as biomarkers of PCa risk warrant further investigation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.