ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2026
Patients referred to but not taken on to an outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) service: the impact of infection specialist advice on the assessment and clinical outcomes.
Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study explored antimicrobial stewardship opportunities, clinical impact and patient outcomes in those referred to an outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) service, screened by an infection specialist but not taken on in a large tertiary centre. Methods: All OPAT referrals that were screened but not taken on by the NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde OPAT service over a 3 year period (2022-2024) were reviewed. Those that were advised an oral antibiotic option that did not require close monitoring and did not require specialist OPAT follow-up were analysed for reason for referral, duration of antibiotic prescribed and patient outcome (readmission and mortality) at 30 days. Results: During the study period 5024 patients were referred to OPAT and 1467 (29.2%) were not taken onto the service. Of these 517 (35%) were given advice to switch to an oral antibiotic option that did not require specific OPAT monitoring. These included referrals for bone and joint, complex intra-abdominal and Conclusions: These data highlight the central role of antimicrobial stewardship in OPAT gate keeping and the importance of measuring the unseen and wider healthcare service impact of OPAT. Assuming those referred had remained on IV therapy then the equivalent of 13 909 days of inpatient or OPAT IV days was avoided.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.