ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026
Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery in gastrointestinal tumors: current applications, oncologic considerations, and future directions.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the rapid development of minimally invasive gastrointestinal surgery, laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) has emerged as a hybrid procedure that integrates the precision of endoscopic resection with the operative control of laparoscopy. By combining these complementary strengths, LECS enables complete local resection while maximizing preservation of organ function. This narrative review retrieved relevant guidelines, expert consensus statements, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and representative clinical studies published between January 2008 and March 2026. We analyzed the technical evolution, indications, efficacy, safety, and oncological issues of LECS, and further propose a clinical application framework covering patient selection, treatment decision-making, criteria for additional radical surgery, the learning curve, structured training, and the strength of global evidence. Current evidence suggests that, in carefully selected patients, LECS can achieve high en bloc and R0 resection rates, reduce unnecessary organ resection, and facilitate postoperative recovery. However, the level of evidence varies substantially among disease entities. Relatively well-established indications include gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), complex colorectal polyps, and selected superficial non-ampullary duodenal tumors, whereas its role in early gastric cancer remains exploratory and is largely limited to highly selected cases involving non-exposure techniques and sentinel lymph node navigation. Overall, LECS serves as an important bridge between endoscopic therapy and conventional surgical resection. Its broader implementation, however, remains limited by oncological uncertainty in malignant tumors, a steep learning curve, inter-center heterogeneity, differences in institutional readiness, and a lack of long-term, high-quality evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.