ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
A prospective risk analysis for the clinical commissioning of a dose-driven continuous scanning proton therapy system.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Proton dose driven continuous scanning (DDCS) is a form of proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) in which the beam may remain on during transitions between successive spots. Mayo Clinic Florida (MCF) is preparing to commission a synchrotron-based proton therapy system designed for DDCS, incorporating novel irradiation control features. Given the novelty and complexity of this system, a systematic risk-based analysis was performed to inform upcoming commissioning strategies. Methods: A prospective risk analysis was conducted using the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Group 100 (TG 100) framework. A comprehensive process map of the DDCS irradiation control workflow was developed. Failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) was performed to identify potential delivery system failure modes and to score each failure mode based on occurrence, severity, and lack of detectability. Targeted mitigation and commissioning strategies were then developed to address the highest-risk items. Results: Twenty-nine delivery system failure modes were identified. The highest-risk failure modes were specific to DDCS operation. Targeted commissioning strategies were defined, including scan path measurement and modeling, validation of move and flap dose, dose monitor collection efficiency testing, spot position monitor performance evaluation, and verification of control system intervention behavior. Incorporation of these strategies into the commissioning plan reduced the mean RPN by more than 50%. Discussion: This work provides a detailed description of the MCF proton DDCS irradiation control system and uses a TG 100 based approach for identifying system-specific risks. As new systems incorporate technologies for which limited guidance exists, institutions must perform their own risk analyses to determine appropriate quality management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.