ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Advanced strategies to enhance the safety, persistence, and efficacy of CAR-T cells in solid tumors.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has revolutionized the treatment of hematologic cancers but encounters challenges, including severe treatment-related toxicities, a highly suppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), limited long-term persistence, and poor trafficking/infiltration into solid tumors. This review outlines recent genetic engineering strategies to address these issues and enhance the safety, durability, and efficacy of CAR-T cell therapy. To reduce cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity, methods such as affinity-tuned and humanized scFvs, hinge/TM optimization, and ITAM calibration have been developed, along with programmable "switch-off" and "switch-on" systems that include suicide genes, antibody-bridging switches, and optogenetic or hypoxia-gated circuits. TME remodeling strategies utilize nanomaterials for targeted cytokine delivery, cell-surface "backpack" systems, and engineered oncolytic viruses that release cytokines or checkpoint-blocking agents. For durability and resistance to exhaustion, precise genome engineering techniques, including CRISPR-based editing and multiplexed shRNA platforms, were employed to target inhibitory receptors and exhaustion-driving transcriptional programs. Additionally, chemokine-receptor engineering and local biomaterial-based delivery systems are discussed as ways to enhance CAR-T trafficking and intratumoral persistence. These innovations collectively point toward integrated, patient-specific CAR-T platforms that incorporate safety controls, metabolic and transcriptional flexibility, and enhanced trafficking through the TME to broaden clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.