Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42245599›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Dream-chasing mindscapes: an inquiry into the psychological change process of postgraduate entrance examination candidates.

Chen Xiaoman, Lu Zihui, Shao Juan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chen XiaomanSchool of Marxism, Xihua University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Lu ZihuiSchool of Marxism, Xihua University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Shao JuanThe Open University of Sichuan, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a pivotal pathway for talent advancement in higher education, the postgraduate entrance examination not only shapes the depth of individuals' academic engagement and the breadth of career development, but also carries candidates' distinctive trajectories of psychological growth across the long preparation cycle. To explore these trajectories during exam preparation, this study focuses on postgraduate entrance examination candidates and adopts a qualitative research design. Analysis of candidates' preparation experiences shows that their psychological States change dynamically over time: in the early stage, they are often marked by confusion. In the middle stage they tend to slip into anxiety, and in the late stage some candidates respond with composure whereas others become so tense under pressure that they approach psychological breakdown. When confronting confusion, anxiety, and a range of other difficulties, candidates regulate themselves through goal orientation, emotional regulation, and social support, thereby preparing for the examination in a better condition. The preparation experience and psychological growth accumulated by these candidates provide valuable points of reference for subsequent cohorts. Accordingly, drawing on the interview findings, this paper proposes stage-specific recommendations in the hope of offering practical and effective guidance and support for more candidates.

Indexed as

candidatesemotional regulationpostgraduate entrance examinationpsychological changesocial support

Identifiers

PMID42245599
PMCPMC13230008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.