ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Beyond the reducing valve: towards a computational neurophenomenology of altered states via deep neural networks.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Altered states of consciousness, including hallucinations, psychedelic experiences, and ego dissolution, differ qualitatively, yet no unified computational framework describes what varies and along which dimensions. Computational phenomenology (CP) has emerged as a promising bridge between first-person experience and computational models, yet current formalisations rely predominantly on the free energy principle (FEP). This paper proposes the C × G × D framework, drawing on three functional roles in deep neural networks: a Classifier (C) that extracts features from sensory input, a Generator (G) that synthesises internal representations, and a Discriminator (D) that judges whether a representation originates externally or internally. Phenomenological differences across altered states are redescribed as variations in the objective functions, constraints, and thresholds of these components. The framework reformulates Huxley's 'reducing valve' metaphor: relaxation of C's constraint exposes normally hidden 'effective causes,' producing psychedelic geometric patterns; G's prior governs hallucinatory veridicality; and D instantiates Perceptual Reality Monitoring. Three hallucination mechanisms-psychedelic, neurodegenerative, and schizophrenia-type-are predicted from distinct parameter configurations. Testable hypotheses derived from iterative-optimisation psychophysics and an extension to ego dissolution are presented. By foregrounding the plurality of objective functions and architectures, the C × G × D framework complements FEP-centred CP and provides a scaffold for translating phenomenology into experimentally manipulable variables.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.