Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42245575›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Sweet-taste liking is associated with preference for less risky and immediate rewards in economic decision-making.

Anna Davidovich, Anna N Shestakova, Nina Arzumanyan, Ksenia Panidi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anna DavidovichCentre for Cognition and Decision Making, Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, HSE University, Moscow, Russia.
Anna N ShestakovaCentre for Cognition and Decision Making, Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, HSE University, Moscow, Russia.
Nina ArzumanyanInternational Laboratory of Social Neurobiology, Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, HSE University, Moscow, Russia.
Ksenia PanidiCentre for Cognition and Decision Making, Institute for Cognitive Neuroscience, HSE University, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Delay discounting refers to the tendency to choose sooner, smaller rewards over larger, later rewards. Many previous studies link this tendency positively to reward sensitivity, yet the specific mechanisms behind this association remain poorly understood. Reward sensitivity may relate to delay discounting through at least three possible pathways: increased sensitivity to reward size, increased sensitivity to reward immediacy, or increased sensitivity to risk. In this study, we use a biologically grounded measure of reward sensitivity, reflected by hedonic preference for sweet taste, to identify which of these mechanisms may be involved in the relationship between reward sensitivity and delay discounting. Methods: In the first experiment ( Results: In Experiment 1, sweet-likers were more risk-aversive compared to sweet-dislikers in a lottery choice task, although no such effect was observed in the BART task. The same tendency toward risk aversion was observed in Experiment 2. In the delay discounting task, sweet-liking participants showed greater preference for sooner smaller reward which was associated with increased sensitivity to the reward immediacy, and not reward size. However, this relationship was partly explained by the greater risk aversion of the sweet-likers compared to sweet-dislikers. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the positive relationship between reward sensitivity and impulsivity may be explained by a stronger preference for certain rewards, rather than a heightened desire for immediate rewards.

Indexed as

impulsive choiceintertemporal choicereward sensitivityrisk aversionsweet-taste liking

Identifiers

PMID42245575
PMCPMC13231436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.