ArticleFrontiers in health services2026
Development and implementation of an integrated orthoptic-speech therapy assessment protocol in neurorehabilitation setting: A community case study.
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and context: Patients with Severe Acquired Brain Injuries (SABI) are a complex challenge in neurorehabilitation. They often cause visual and cognitive-communicative disorders that require a multidisciplinary approach, yet few clear strategies exist for effectively integrating rehabilitation professionals and optimizing care pathways. To improve care for complex patients, this study aimed to examine how clinicians perceive the impact of deficits in vision and communication. The research specifically focused on the state of team collaboration among clinicians (including physicians and nurses), healthcare professionals, and between speech and language therapists and orthoptists, while identifying effective strategies to address these challenges. Methods: This qualitative study used a mixed-method approach, combining documentary research, participant observation, a focus group, and an open-ended questionnaire, which were administered to two distinct groups of professionals. Data were collected and triangulated to ensure ecological rigor and provide a deep understanding of the clinical process and its challenges. All data were analyzed thematically to identify recurring themes and common perceptions. Findings and discussion: The results confirmed clinicians' perception of the important role that visual, cognitive, and communicative disorders play. They highlight a perceived lack of information regarding visual aspects in medical records. The analysis revealed a clear difference in the perception of professional integration; the Speech and Language Pathologist was perceived as a well-integrated figure, while the orthoptist was found to be less effective in the team. The participants' recommendations emphasized the need for shared written evaluation communication tools regarding speech and language therapy and orthoptic aspects. These tools should use a common language, such as a written protocol. Conclusions: The study underscores the importance of overcoming informational and coordination barriers between disciplines to optimize the care pathway for patients with SABI. The results suggest that the adoption of a shared protocol can significantly improve multidisciplinary integration and the quality of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.