Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42245543›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in health services2026

Development and implementation of an integrated orthoptic-speech therapy assessment protocol in neurorehabilitation setting: A community case study.

Rosaliria Grossi, Federica Guidi, Francesca Rossi, Mariangela Vaira, Patrizia Cancialosi, Lucia Portis, Maurizio Beatrici, Lorella Cocchini, Chiara Maria Eandi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rosaliria GrossiDepartment of Mental Health, ASST Pavia, Pavia, Italy.
Federica GuidiDepartment of Surgical Science, Eye Clinic, AOU "Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino", Turin, Italy.
Francesca RossiDepartment of Rehabilitation Service, Public Health and Paediatric Sciences, AOU "Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino", Turin, Italy.
Mariangela VairaDepartment of Surgical Science, Eye Clinic, AOU "Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino", Turin, Italy.
Patrizia CancialosiSC Neurorehabilitation, AOU "Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino", Turin, Italy.
Lucia PortisDepartment of Public Health and Paediatric Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Maurizio BeatriciSC Neurorehabilitation, AOU "Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino", Turin, Italy.
Lorella CocchiniSC Neurorehabilitation, AOU "Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino", Turin, Italy.
Chiara Maria EandiDepartment of Surgical Science, Eye Clinic, AOU "Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino", Turin, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction and context: Patients with Severe Acquired Brain Injuries (SABI) are a complex challenge in neurorehabilitation. They often cause visual and cognitive-communicative disorders that require a multidisciplinary approach, yet few clear strategies exist for effectively integrating rehabilitation professionals and optimizing care pathways. To improve care for complex patients, this study aimed to examine how clinicians perceive the impact of deficits in vision and communication. The research specifically focused on the state of team collaboration among clinicians (including physicians and nurses), healthcare professionals, and between speech and language therapists and orthoptists, while identifying effective strategies to address these challenges. Methods: This qualitative study used a mixed-method approach, combining documentary research, participant observation, a focus group, and an open-ended questionnaire, which were administered to two distinct groups of professionals. Data were collected and triangulated to ensure ecological rigor and provide a deep understanding of the clinical process and its challenges. All data were analyzed thematically to identify recurring themes and common perceptions. Findings and discussion: The results confirmed clinicians' perception of the important role that visual, cognitive, and communicative disorders play. They highlight a perceived lack of information regarding visual aspects in medical records. The analysis revealed a clear difference in the perception of professional integration; the Speech and Language Pathologist was perceived as a well-integrated figure, while the orthoptist was found to be less effective in the team. The participants' recommendations emphasized the need for shared written evaluation communication tools regarding speech and language therapy and orthoptic aspects. These tools should use a common language, such as a written protocol. Conclusions: The study underscores the importance of overcoming informational and coordination barriers between disciplines to optimize the care pathway for patients with SABI. The results suggest that the adoption of a shared protocol can significantly improve multidisciplinary integration and the quality of care.

Indexed as

acquired brain injuryaction researchICFinterdisciplinary evaluationmultidisciplinarityneurorehabilitationorthoptistspeech and language therapist

Identifiers

PMID42245543
PMCPMC13230197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.