Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42245522›Full record

ArticleACS sustainable chemistry & engineering2026

Inactivation of PETase at Interfaces Inhibits PET Plastic Depolymerization.

Alecia Robinson, Hannah Lippincott, Chris E MacFarlane, David J Kelaita, Catherine Moul, Gur Pines, Daniel K Schwartz, Joel L Kaar, Jason T Boock, Jason A Berberich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alecia RobinsonDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio 45056, United States.
Hannah LippincottDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio 45056, United States.
Chris E MacFarlaneDepartment of Chemical, Paper and Biomedical Engineering, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio 45056, United States.
David J KelaitaDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States.
Catherine MoulDepartment of Chemical, Paper and Biomedical Engineering, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio 45056, United States.
Gur PinesDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States.
Daniel K SchwartzDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5397-7200
Joel L KaarDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0794-3955
Jason T BoockDepartment of Chemical, Paper and Biomedical Engineering, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio 45056, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5111-0969
Jason A BerberichDepartment of Chemical, Paper and Biomedical Engineering, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio 45056, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1396-6993

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enzymatic depolymerization of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) is a promising alternative to traditional recycling showing promise in addressing issues with high energy demands and challenges associated with mixed-waste streams. While engineered, thermostable PETase variants exist, achieving high yields under industrially relevant process conditions remains a significant hurdle. Poor thermostability and PET crystallinity are often blamed for low conversions, but these factors do not fully account for the low productivity observed in all cases. This suggests that other poorly understood phenomena may be limiting the catalytic efficiency of PETase warranting further investigation. This work systematically explores the impact of mixing, and in particular, the presence of the air-water and the solid-liquid interfaces, on PETase stability. We found that PET degradation plateaus while soluble PETase activity is lost at increasing mixing rates when an air-water interface is present. It is hypothesized that the enzyme adsorbs to the air-water interface leading to denaturation, aggregation and precipitation. Additional studies demonstrate that the hydrophobic PET film negatively impacts enzyme stability and the rate of enzyme inactivation is also proportional to the PET surface area. Traditional approaches to mitigate enzyme inactivation at interfaces, such as using blocking agents, were effective in preserving enzyme activity, but resulted in significantly reduced PET degradation rates. In contrast, PEGylation of PETase yielded improved stability and enhanced PET degradation during mixing. These findings help explain the significant conversion discrepancies reported in previous studies and demonstrate a robust strategy for improving PETase performance under industrially relevant conditions.

Indexed as

air−liquid interfacebiocatalysisenzyme stabilityinterfacial inactivationPETPETaseplastics recycling

Identifiers

PMID42245522
PMCPMC13231421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.