ArticleSSM. Qualitative research in health2025
An in-depth interview study of women's perspectives on the effects of contraceptive use on future fertility in Ethiopia and Kenya.
Article in SSM. Qualitative research in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impacts of Contraception on Future Fertility: Addressing Concerns to Improve Understanding.Studies in family planning · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infertility is a common perceived side effect of contraceptive use among women in sub-Saharan Africa, and fear of infertility can affect contraceptive choices. While no choice is inherently negative, it is critical that women have accurate information about side effects to ensure contraceptive decision-making agency. Despite the prevalence of infertility fears, little is known about women's specific beliefs, where they originate, and how they inform contraceptive decisions. We sought to fill this gap in Kenya and Ethiopia through in-depth interviews with women aged 15-45 in Nairobi and Kisumu, Kenya, and Addis Ababa and North Shoa Zone of Amhara Region, Ethiopia (N=83). We utilized a modified grounded theory approach for data collection and analysis. While not all participants believed in a link between contraception and infertility, those that did understood several mechanisms. Some, such as delayed return to fertility and aging out of childbearing years, were supported by clinical evidence. Others, such as accumulation of harmful substances in the body, damage to the reproductive system, and negative effects from early or prolonged use, were not supported by clinical evidence. Healthcare providers were a trusted source of information, disseminating information supported and unsupported by clinical evidence. Fear of infertility led women to prefer non-hormonal or short-term methods, avoid methods that cause amenorrhea, or delay use until after having children. Results suggest the need to address side effect misinformation given by providers. Further, the specificity this study offers can inform strategies to improve contraceptive counseling and education campaigns in service of decision-making agency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.