Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42245436›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of multimedia information retrieval2026

FME-24: A film, music, and emotion dataset.

Ruby Olivia Nagano Crocker, György Fazekas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of multimedia information retrieval, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ruby Olivia Nagano CrockerCentre for Digital Music, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS UK.
György FazekasCentre for Digital Music, Queen Mary University of London, Mile End Road, London, E1 4NS UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper introduces an updated, publicly accessible version of the Film, Music and Emotion Dataset (FME-24), designed to examine how perceived emotion in film music evolves over time. It provides a comprehensive introduction to the dataset and explores its potential applications across music information retrieval (MIR), psychology, and AI-training contexts. The FME-24 dataset utilises film's immersive qualities to study emotional perception in a naturalistic yet controlled setting. It contains data from 275 film scores spanning the past two decades, including experimental and mainstream works. The dataset integrates high-quality film compositions with time-stamped valence-arousal (V-A) annotations, emotion sentences, familiarity ratings, and detailed metadata. 98 Participants contributed to annotating these temporal emotion features. For each time-stamped point, a two-second audio segment was analysed, and 78 features were extracted, including low-level timbral descriptors (MFCC statistics, spectral centroid), rhythmic descriptors (onset density, tempo), and higher-level psychoacoustic and tonal features (inharmonicity, roughness, chord transitions, tonal entropy). Although full audio files are unavailable due to licensing, reproducibility is ensured via ISRC codes, precise segment timings, and open access to all metadata and feature files in CSV format. The paper details the dataset's structure, annotation, and feature-extraction procedures, highlighting applications in computational and perceptual research and laying a foundation for future studies on emotion, perception, and narrative in film music.

Indexed as

DatasetsEmotion AnnotationFilm EmotionFilm MusicMultimodal AnalysisMusic DatasetsMusic EmotionTemporal Music AnalysisValence-Arousal

Identifiers

PMID42245436
PMCPMC13230302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.