ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
The impact of generative AI use on employees' psychological distress: a moderated mediation model.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: With the widespread adoption of generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI) in the workplace, concerns have emerged about whether employees experience psychological distress alongside efficiency improvements. Methods: Based on the Stimulus-Organism-Response (SOR) framework, we developed a moderated mediation model and used survey data from 424 Chinese employees to examine the relationship between Gen AI use and employees' psychological distress. We tested dual mediating pathways (job insecurity and workplace loneliness) and two boundary conditions (information literacy and AI ethical risk perception). Results: Our study reveals that Gen AI use is significantly associated with psychological distress via the dual mediating paths of job insecurity and workplace loneliness. Employees' information literacy can mitigate the relationship between Gen AI and job insecurity, and further moderate the mediating effect on psychological distress. Conversely, AI ethical risk perception strengthens the relationship between Gen AI and workplace loneliness, and is further associated with psychological distress via a moderated mediation effect. Discussion: Our study contributes to the theoretical understanding and empirical evidence regarding the relationship between Gen AI and employees' psychological distress. It also provides practical recommendations for managers and employees on how to interact effectively with Gen AI tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.