Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42245299›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026

Nasojejunal tube, jejunostomy tube, and fine needle catheter jejunostomy effects after esophagectomy.

Wu Wang, Tianbao Yang, Jinbiao Xie, Shijie Huang, Boyang Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wu WangDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Putian University, Putian, China.
Tianbao YangDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Putian University, Putian, China.
Jinbiao XieDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Putian University, Putian, China.
Shijie HuangDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Putian University, Putian, China.
Boyang ChenDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Putian University, Putian, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: To analyze and compare the effect of nasojejunal tube placement (NTP), jejunostomy tube placement (JTP), and fine needle catheter jejunostomy (FNCJ) after esophagectomy. Methods: Herein, 159 patients with esophageal carcinoma who underwent esophagectomy were retrospectively analyzed and divided into the following groups: the NTP group ( Results: The complication rate was significantly higher in the NTP group than in the two other groups ( Conclusions: NTP showed distinct advantages and disadvantages compared with JTP and FNCJ. When selecting the feeding method, comprehensive consideration should be given to the patient's specific condition.

Indexed as

esophagectomyfeeding methodfine needle catheter jejunostomyjejunostomy tube placementnasojejunal tube placement

Identifiers

PMID42245299
PMCPMC13230019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.