Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42245255›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Knowledge, attitudes, practices, and barriers toward artificial intelligence integration among nursing and health sciences students: A cross-sectional study.

Nesreen Alqaissi, Mohammad Qtait, Fuad Farajalla, Marwa Al-Tamimi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nesreen AlqaissiNursing College, Palestine Polytechnic University, Hebron.
Mohammad QtaitNursing College, Palestine Polytechnic University, Hebron.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2414-7982
Fuad FarajallaNursing College, Palestine Polytechnic University, Hebron.
Marwa Al-TamimiNursing College, Palestine Polytechnic University, Hebron.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly transforming healthcare delivery and health professions education, creating a need for future healthcare professionals to develop adequate knowledge, practical skills, and ethical awareness. However, many students remain exposed to AI tools without receiving structured academic preparation. This study aimed to assess knowledge, attitudes, practices, and perceived barriers toward AI among nursing and health sciences students. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 242 undergraduate students at a public university in Palestine between January and February 2025. Data were collected using a structured self-administered questionnaire adapted from previous literature and refined through expert review and pilot testing. The survey assessed sociodemographic characteristics, AI-related knowledge and exposure, attitudes, practices, and perceived barriers. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data, while Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests examined subgroup differences. Results: Participants had a mean age of 20.4 ± 2.28 years, and 77.3% were female. Most students reported using AI tools (83.1%), whereas only 31.0% had received formal AI training. Overall knowledge/exposure scores were moderate (2.78 ± 1.12), attitudes were generally positive (3.64 ± 0.61), and practice levels were moderate (3.18 ± 0.72). No significant differences in knowledge or practice scores were observed across demographic variables (p > .05). Students with formal AI training demonstrated significantly higher attitude scores (p = .019). The most frequently reported barriers were ethical and privacy concerns (44.2%), limited curriculum integration (42.6%), and lack of knowledge or expertise (38.4%). Conclusions: Students demonstrated substantial exposure to AI technologies but limited structured preparedness for their effective and ethical use. Positive attitudes toward AI suggest readiness for educational adoption; however, moderate knowledge and practice levels indicate the need for formal curriculum integration, faculty development, and competency-based training. Addressing ethical concerns and institutional barriers is essential to support responsible AI implementation in nursing and health sciences education.

Indexed as

and practicesartificial intelligenceattitudeseducational barriershealth sciences educationknowledgenursing students

Identifiers

PMID42245255
PMCPMC13231037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.