ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026
The adverse effects of non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation on the cerebral hemodynamics of premature infants: point-of-care brain ultrasound findings from a case-series study.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: In recent years, non-invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (NHFOV) has been widely used in clinical practice for premature infants with respiratory distress. However, until now, the focus of all published studies has been on the effect of NHFOV on patient's respiratory system, and its impact on the neonatal cerebral hemodynamics has not been considered. Method: We monitored the hemodynamics of the anterior cerebral arteries of 10 premature infants who received NHFOV treatment because of respiratory distress and compared them with the cerebral hemodynamics of patients who received invasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (IHFOV), invasive conventional mechanical ventilation (IMV), nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP), and those who did not receive ventilator treatment at the same time. Results: The results of this study revealed that NHFOV can have serious adverse effects on the cerebral hemodynamics of infants and subsequently lead to brain damage. Most importantly, this adverse effect of NHFOV is even more severe than that caused by IHFOV and IMV. Conclusion: Given that NHFOV has a severely adverse effect on the cerebral hemodynamics of patients compared with other non-invasive ventilation modes, it does not have any distinct advantages; therefore, we believe that NHFOV should be used with caution in premature infants, especially those who are extremely premature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.