ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2026
Predicting time across age: comparing performance and neural dynamics of younger and older adults in a temporal prediction task.
Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Temporal prediction is the ability to anticipate the likely time of occurrence of events and is important for adaptive behaviour in our everyday lives. Studies indicated that predictive aspects of environmental stimuli can be leveraged to reduce reaction times and enhance stimulus processing. Particularly, a recent study showed that this optimized behaviour is associated with a phase adjustment of ongoing neural oscillations aligning with the expected onset of upcoming stimuli. In ageing, there is some evidence that temporal predictions might be altered, however findings are inconsistent. Thus, we aimed to explore whether and how anticipatory oscillatory markers of temporal prediction change with age. To this end, 20 right-handed younger adults (14 females, age = 25.4 ± 4.13 years) and 20 right-handed older adults (13 females, age = 60.35 ± 3.92 years) performed a temporal prediction task while 64-channel EEG was recorded. In the task, a visual stimulus moved across the screen toward an occluder, disappeared and reappeared after a variable time delay. Participants judged whether the visual stimulus reappeared "too early" or "too late." Results indicated comparable temporal prediction performance between younger and older adults. We observed a stronger task-related decrease of beta activity in older compared to younger adults. Further, we observed phase adjustments of ongoing delta activity aligning with the disappearance of moving stimuli which was stronger in older compared to younger adults. Together, these observations provide several new insights into the neural dynamics supporting temporal prediction and suggest that neural dynamics associated with temporal prediction appear sensitive to ageing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.