ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2026
Prediction of blood-brain barrier-penetrating peptides using B3BPFN.
Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predicting blood-brain barrier (BBB)-penetrating peptides remains critical for peptide-based central nervous system drug delivery, yet model performance depends strongly on data curation and feature representation. In this study, we constructed a benchmark dataset from publicly available resources by merging peptide records and removing duplicate sequences, resulting in 426 positive and 6,865 negative samples. Each peptide was encoded using fused representations that combine protein language model embeddings with physicochemical descriptors, yielding a 2,121-dimensional feature space. After variance filtering, standardization, and mutual-information-based feature selection, the top 700 features were retained for classification. To address class imbalance, the majority class in the training set was randomly undersampled to achieve a 1:5 positive-to-negative ratio. A foundation model for tabular classification, termed B3BPFN, was then trained on the processed feature matrix and evaluated on an independent balanced test set comprising 20% of the positive samples and an equal number of negative samples. The final model achieved a sensitivity of 0.9294, specificity of 0.8824, accuracy of 0.9059, Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) of 0.8127, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.9460. SHAP analysis further revealed that composition-transition-distribution (CTDD) descriptors serve as important features for BBB-penetrating peptide prediction. A user-friendly web server is freely available at https://ycclab.cuhk.edu.cn/b3bpfn to facilitate community use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.