Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42245113›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026

Synergistic application of controlled-release urea and potassium chloride to enhance wheat yield and nutrient use efficiency.

Xiuyi Yang, Jianbang Li, Wenxiao Zhang, Wenjun Jia, Zeli Li, Jibiao Geng, Shutong Lei, Hui Li, Qingping Zhang, Ying Lang and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Xiuyi YangCollege of Agriculture and Forestry Science, College of Resources and Environment, Linyi University, Linyi, Shandong, China.
Jianbang LiCollege of Agriculture and Forestry Science, College of Resources and Environment, Linyi University, Linyi, Shandong, China.
Wenxiao ZhangCollege of Agriculture and Forestry Science, College of Resources and Environment, Linyi University, Linyi, Shandong, China.
Wenjun JiaCollege of Agriculture and Forestry Science, College of Resources and Environment, Linyi University, Linyi, Shandong, China.
Zeli LiCollege of Agriculture and Forestry Science, College of Resources and Environment, Linyi University, Linyi, Shandong, China.
Jibiao GengCollege of Agriculture and Forestry Science, College of Resources and Environment, Linyi University, Linyi, Shandong, China.
Shutong LeiCollege of Agriculture and Forestry Science, College of Resources and Environment, Linyi University, Linyi, Shandong, China.
Hui LiCollege of Agriculture and Forestry Science, College of Resources and Environment, Linyi University, Linyi, Shandong, China.
Qingping ZhangCollege of Agriculture and Forestry Science, College of Resources and Environment, Linyi University, Linyi, Shandong, China.
Ying LangCollege of Agriculture and Forestry Science, College of Resources and Environment, Linyi University, Linyi, Shandong, China.
Xianqi HuoCollege of Agriculture and Forestry Science, College of Resources and Environment, Linyi University, Linyi, Shandong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nitrogen and potassium fertilization played a central role in promoting the growth of wheat. A three-year (2022-2024) split-plot field experiment was conducted to investigate the impacts of combining controlled-release urea (CRU) with controlled-release potassium chloride (CRK) on nutrient leaching and use efficiency in wheat fields. In this study, the control plot received neither nitrogen nor potassium applications (Control). The main plots were designated based on nitrogen fertilizer types, including controlled-release urea (CRU) and conventional urea (Urea). The sub-plots were assigned potassium fertilizer rates using CRK, specifically 50 kg ha-1 (LCRK), 75 kg ha-1 (MCRK), and 100 kg ha-1 (HCRK). The wheat yields in CRU treatments witnessed a modest average increase of 2.2% from 2022 to 2024 compared to ordinary urea treatments. In the final season, nitrogen recovery efficiency augmented by 10.9%. Furthermore, CRU treatments boosted the number of wheat spikes and grains per spike but had no notable influence on the thousand-grain weight (TGW) of wheat. Consequently, the yield enhancement observed in CRU treatments was primarily attributed to an increase in tiller count of wheat. The application of CRU×MCRK modestly improved wheat leaf photosynthesis during its mid to late growth stages, nutrient use efficiency and potential environmental benefits.

Indexed as

controlled-release potassium chloridecontrolled-release ureanutrient use efficiencywheatyield

Identifiers

PMID42245113
PMCPMC13229635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.