ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Role of genetic risk on progression to diabetes in children with acute pancreatitis.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Acute pancreatitis (AP) is an established risk factor for diabetes, with approximately 20% of children developing either prediabetes or diabetes within one year of their first episode. Little is known about the diabetes pathophysiology or which individuals are at highest risk. We aimed to evaluate whether genetic risk scores (GRS) for type 1 (T1D) and polygenic risk scores (PRS) type 2 diabetes (T2D) are associated with progression to dysglycemia following AP. Methods: Clinical data were available for 123 children (mean age (IQR), 12 (8-15) years; mean body mass index (BMI), 21.8) with AP who were followed for >1 year. Array genotyping coupled with imputation using the TOPMed reference panel was performed. Genetic ancestry was predicted using a random forest classifier. GRS for T1D and T2D were calculated using either an ancestry-appropriate (T1D-GRS) or a multi-ancestry (T2D-PRS) weighted framework. To evaluate risk compared to the population we used predefined GRS thresholds from UK Biobank. Results: Among the 123 subjects, 24 developed dysglycemia (5 with diabetes and 19 with prediabetes). The majority (75.6%, n=93) of children were of European ancestry. Comparison of the T1D-GRS burden with the UK BioBank showed numerically higher proportions for any given threshold. At the top 5% threshold, 9.7% of our cohort were classified as high-risk compared to 5% in UK Biobank (p<0.05). The elevated T1D-GRS could be primarily attributed to non-HLA variants and was more enriched in those testing positive for ≥1 islet-autoantibody. The T2D-PRS was also elevated in the dysglycemic group but only reached statistical significance in those who were obese. Conclusion: These findings highlight the potential role of both T1D-GRS and T2D-PRS in investigating diabetes susceptibility following AP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.