Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42245045›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026

Patient Versus Prediction-Level Evaluation of a Dynamic Clinical Prediction Model of Sepsis.

Marcelle Tuttle, Carolien C H M Maas, Jennie An, Benjamin S Wessler, William F Harvey, Harry P Selker, David van Klaveren, David M Kent

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marcelle TuttleDepartment of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-1246-8879
Carolien C H M MaasLeiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3867-2465
Jennie AnPredictive Analytics and Comparative Effectiveness Center, Tufts Medical Center/Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-5272-7300
Benjamin S WesslerPredictive Analytics and Comparative Effectiveness Center, Tufts Medical Center/Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8652-1426
William F HarveyDepartment of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Harry P SelkerInstitute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5322-7178
David van KlaverenDepartment of Public Health, Center for Medical Decision Making, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2096-606X
David M KentDepartment of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9205-5070

Funding

Tufts Clinical and Translational Science Institute (Clinical Trial Design Labs Supplement)UM1TR004398 · NCATS · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI Harry P. Selker · 2023 to 2026
$44.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004398
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Epic Sepsis Model version 2 (ESMv2) is a prediction model embedded into the electronic medical record used to warn clinicians which hospitalized patients are at risk for sepsis. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 31,951 hospitalizations of 25,760 patients to compare analyses conducted at the commonly used patient-level (where a maximum prediction prior to the onset of sepsis is used to measure performance) vs novel prediction-level (where each prediction is used to measure performance). Sepsis, defined by the Sepsis 3 criteria occurred during 1,049 hospitalizations (3.3%). Patient-level analyses suggested excellent discrimination AUC 0.86; [IQR 0.85, 0.87], whereas prediction-level analyses demonstrated lower performance AUC 0.62; [IQR 0.57, 0.65]. Low estimates of the positive predictive value (14.5% at the patient level vs 4% at the prediction level) imply a high number of false alerts. Common evaluation approaches may overstate the performance of dynamic prediction models and mislead clinical decision-making.

Identifiers

PMID42245045
PMCPMC13232392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.