ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Regional excitability, not epileptic pathology, drives stimulation-evoked interictal spike increases.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: Interictal spikes have been proposed as a biomarker for both localizing seizure onset zones (SOZ) and tracking changes in seizure risk with neurostimulation in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Electrical stimulation can modulate spike rates acutely, and it has been proposed that measuring this modulation can help localize the SOZ. However, it is unclear whether stimulation-induced spike rate changes reflect epilepsy-specific pathology in the stimulated network or simply intrinsic regional excitability, which limits our understanding of their utility in epilepsy surgery planning. Methods: We analyzed low-frequency stimulation (LFS; 1 Hz) applied during a clinical seizure-induction protocol systematically targeting multiple brain regions in 43 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy undergoing intracranial EEG monitoring. A validated, automated spike detector was used to quantify pre-, during-, and post-stimulation spike rates. We tested whether the stimulation-evoked spike rate response (i) tracks the expected change in seizure risk from a seizure induction protocol, (ii) varies with anatomical stimulation site and epilepsy localization, (iii) localizes the SOZ beyond baseline spike rate, and (iv) is accompanied by changes in spike morphology. Results: Nearby LFS acutely increased spike rates in high-spiking channels (inter-stimulation median 2.25 vs. during-stimulation 4.25 spikes/min; p < 0.001), with effects attenuating with distance and resolving within approximately 30 seconds of stimulation offset. Mesial temporal lobe stimulation produced the largest increase in nearby spike rates relative to temporal neocortex and other cortex (Kruskal-Wallis p = 0.003), but this effect did not differ between patients with and without mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. A random forest classifier incorporating stimulation-evoked modulation features achieved an AUC of 0.787, comparable to a resting-state spike model (AUC 0.747; DeLong p = 0.81), indicating that stimulation-evoked spike changes do not add localizing information beyond resting-state spike rates. Stimulation produced a small but significant shift in spike morphology toward broader, higher-amplitude discharges (PERMANOVA p < 0.001), consistent with recruitment of a broader neuronal population. Significance: LFS-evoked increases in interictal spike rates reflect intrinsic regional excitability, greatest in the mesial temporal lobe, rather than epilepsy-specific pathology, and do not improve SOZ localization over resting-state spike rates. These results argue against using the change in spikes with stimulation to localize the SOZ. On the other hand, the transient spike rate increase induced by a pro-epileptic protocol supports the acute change in spike rate as a biomarker of stimulation's effect on seizure risk, with potential to guide parameter selection for epilepsy neuromodulation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.