ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2026
Association of a polygenic risk score with coronary atherosclerotic burden in clinical CT angiograms.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Polygenic risk scores (PRS) for coronary artery disease (CAD) are associated with cardiovascular events, but the relationship between inherited risk and routinely reported coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) findings has not been studied. Objectives: To evaluate associations between a genome-wide PRS for angiographic coronary disease burden and coronary CTA-derived measures of atherosclerotic severity in a real-world clinical cohort. Methods: We studied Penn Medicine BioBank participants with available genotypes and clinically obtained coronary CTA reports. A previously published PRS for angiographic CAD burden was calculated using pgsc_calc. CAD-RADS scores and coronary artery calcium (CAC) values were extracted from radiology reports using the large language model Llama 3.1 8B. Associations between PRS and CAD-RADS severity were evaluated using Bayesian cumulative ordinal logit regression, while associations with log-transformed CAC burden were assessed using Bayesian linear regression. Results: Among 630 participants, median age was 59 years (IQR 49 - 68), 53% were female, 62% were genetically similar to a European reference population, and 34% to an African reference population. LLM-extracted CAD-RADS and CAC values demonstrated near-perfect agreement with manual abstraction. Higher PRS was associated with greater coronary atherosclerotic burden on CTA. Each 1-standard deviation (SD) increase in PRS was associated with a 20% higher odds of belonging to a more severe CAD-RADS category (cumulative OR 1.20, 95% credible interval 1.06-1.44). Higher PRS was also associated with greater CAC burden (β 0.38, 95% credible interval 0.15 - 0.61). Conclusions: Polygenic risk for angiographic coronary disease burden is reflected in clinically reported coronary CTA severity measures, including CAD-RADS and CAC. These findings demonstrate that inherited susceptibility to CAD manifests as greater anatomic atherosclerotic burden at the time of clinical presentation and support further investigation of genetic risk integration into imaging-based cardiovascular risk assessment.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.