ReviewTheranostics2026
Stimuli-responsive nanomaterials for wound healing: advances and emerging directions.
Review in Theranostics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Smart Polymeric Wound Dressings for Wound Treatment: Contributions and Applications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In wound healing applications, conventional nanomaterials fail to precisely regulate the wound healing process because of the lack of dynamic adaptation to the wound microenvironment. Conversely, stimuli-responsive nanomaterials can respond to endogenous stimuli such as pH, enzymes, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and glucose, as well as exogenous stimuli such as light, electricity, and magnetism. Thus, stimuli-responsive nanomaterials can facilitate precise drug delivery and effectively treat wounds, and some of these materials can even achieve integrated diagnosis and treatment. Previous reviews have focused mainly on hydrogel carriers with stimuli-responsive properties. This review focuses on stimuli-responsive nanomaterials, classifies these materials on the basis of their stimulus sources, and systematically summarizes the response mechanisms, application outcomes, and design strategies of endogenous, exogenous, and dual stimuli-responsive nanomaterials applied in wound healing. Furthermore, this review explores the research gaps and future developments of stimuli-responsive nanomaterials for wound healing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.