ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2026
Metabolic and bariatric surgery in mild obesity: mid-term outcomes and safety in an Asian population.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is an established treatment for severe obesity, but its role in Asian patients with mild obesity (body mass index [BMI] 27.5-32.5 kg/m²) remains controversial due to limited mid-term evidence. This study evaluated the ≥3-year outcomes of MBS in this population compared with patients with BMI ≥32.5 kg/m². Objective: To evaluate the mid-term (≥3 years) efficacy and safety of MBS in Asian patients with mild obesity, compared with those with BMI ≥MIhe kg/m². Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 26 patients with mild obesity and 76 matched patients with higher BMI underwent MBS between 2013 and 2020. Outcomes included percent total weight loss (%TWL), metabolic control, remission of obesity-related comorbidities, and postoperative complications. The primary composite endpoint was defined as glycated hemoglobin <6.5%, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <2.6 mmol/L, systolic blood pressure <130 mmHg, and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance <2.5 mmol/L, μU/mL. Results: At a mean follow-up of approximately 5 years, the mild obesity group achieved lower %TWL than the higher-BMI group (approximately 20% vs 26%, Conclusion: In Asian patients, MBS appears safe and provides durable metabolic benefits across BMI categories. Despite losing less weight, those with mild obesity achieved similar cardiometabolic improvements and were more likely to reach a normal BMI. These findings are preliminary. Future research should prioritize large, multicenter studies focusing on the BMI 27.5-30 kg/m² subgroup without advanced metabolic disease, randomized trials comparing surgery with current pharmacotherapies, and long-term studies tracking hard cardiovascular endpoints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.