ArticleClinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science2026
Emotion-Processing Biases and Neural Connectivity in Remitted Major Depressive Disorder among Adolescents.
Article in Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Major depressive disorder (MDD) among adolescents is recurrent and characterized by persistent emotion-processing biases. Adolescents (N=161; ages 13-18-years-old; remitted MDD=90, healthy controls=71) completed baseline and 6-month clinical assessments. Additionally, at baseline, participants completed the Facial Recognition Task while EEG data were recorded. The late positive potential (LPP) and effective connectivity during negative emotion processing were examined in relation to 6-month depressive symptoms and behavioral withdrawal (homestay from passive GPS). No group differences in LPP emerged. However, remitted MDD showed stronger right precuneus-superior frontal gyrus (theta-alpha) to sad faces and weaker left precuneus-SFG (alpha-beta) to angry faces relative to controls. Greater right precuneus-SFG connectivity during sad faces predicted depressive symptom severity (b=0.221, p=.025) and increased homestay (b=242.78, p=.048). Thus, altered precuneus-SFG connectivity during sad face processing may serve as a neural marker of depression risk, which could support early identification approaches and personalized interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.