Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42244868›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026

Cochlear isolation in neonatal mice for

Eugenue V Polikarpov, Sergey V Kozin, Elena Smolyarchuk, Kirill Savostyanov, Artem V Mirontsev, Susanna Sologova, Veronika V Chasovnikova, Ksenia V Eremeeva, Andrey Fisenko, Dmitry Kudlay and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Eugenue V PolikarpovInstitute of Pharmacy, FSAEI HE I.M. Sechenov First MSMU of MOH of Russia (Sechenovskiy University), Moscow, Russia.
Sergey V KozinInstitute of Pharmacy, FSAEI HE I.M. Sechenov First MSMU of MOH of Russia (Sechenovskiy University), Moscow, Russia.
Elena SmolyarchukInstitute of Pharmacy, FSAEI HE I.M. Sechenov First MSMU of MOH of Russia (Sechenovskiy University), Moscow, Russia.
Kirill SavostyanovNational Medical Research Center of Children's Health, Russian Ministry of Health, Moscow, Russia.
Artem V MirontsevInstitute of Pharmacy, FSAEI HE I.M. Sechenov First MSMU of MOH of Russia (Sechenovskiy University), Moscow, Russia.
Susanna SologovaInstitute of Pharmacy, FSAEI HE I.M. Sechenov First MSMU of MOH of Russia (Sechenovskiy University), Moscow, Russia.
Veronika V ChasovnikovaResearch and Clinical Center for Otorhinolaryngology FMBA of Russia, Moscow, Russia.
Ksenia V EremeevaInstitute of Pharmacy, FSAEI HE I.M. Sechenov First MSMU of MOH of Russia (Sechenovskiy University), Moscow, Russia.
Andrey FisenkoNational Medical Research Center of Children's Health, Russian Ministry of Health, Moscow, Russia.
Dmitry KudlayInstitute of Pharmacy, FSAEI HE I.M. Sechenov First MSMU of MOH of Russia (Sechenovskiy University), Moscow, Russia.
Zanda BakaevaInstitute of Pharmacy, FSAEI HE I.M. Sechenov First MSMU of MOH of Russia (Sechenovskiy University), Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Methods: We propose an optimized stepwise technique for cochlear isolation based on dissection of skull bones along specific anatomical skull lines-the spheno-occipital, spheno-petrosal, and petro-occipital synchondroses, along with the petrosquamosal suture. This approach utilizes targeted dissection along natural anatomical skull lines to carefully separate skull bones, reducing excess tissue and unnecessary manipulation of the cochlea. Sample preservation was assessed through immunofluorescence staining for hair cells (phalloidin) and spiral ganglion neurons (β-III tubulin) in both Results: The technique significantly reduced superfluous tissue adherence, thereby facilitating subsequent processing of the cochlear surface. Intact cochleae were consistently obtained with preserved auditory capsules and the structure of the membranous labyrinth. Immunofluorescence analysis confirmed the preservation of inner ear samples obtained for creating Conclusion: Cochlear isolation is a technically challenging procedure that requires both practiced skill and careful execution. A key feature of our protocol lies in the emphasis on specific anatomical landmarks, which facilitates a clearer understanding of the cochlear isolation process and prevents actions that would compromise the integrity of the cochlea. This is important for researchers who are developing the skills necessary to create

Indexed as

auditory neuronscochlear explantcochlear isolationhair cellinner earotic capsuletemporal bone

Identifiers

PMID42244868
PMCPMC13230896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.