ReviewChemical science2026
Rethinking photosensitization in therapy and sun protection.
Review in Chemical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Silk Fibroin Peptides Promote Extracellular Matrix Homeostasis in Photoaging via Modulation of the ITGB1/FAK-TGF-β/Smad Signaling Axis.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Photodynamic therapy: a promising alternative for high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion treatment.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Light-induced tissue damage involves photosensitization. This process forms the basis of photodynamic therapy but also underlies photoaging and skin cancer development during excessive sun exposure. This review bridges these interlinked, yet rarely connected fields. We propose a unified classification distinguishing photosensitizers, photocatalysts, photoinitiators, and photocatalytic initiators based on absorber fate and downstream radical chain propagation. This framework resolves longstanding ambiguities and carries direct mechanistic consequences. Our central thesis is that subcellular localization determines the biological outcome far more than quantum yields. Membrane-bound photosensitizers permeabilize organelles orders of magnitude more efficiently than their broadly distributed counterparts, provided direct photosensitizer-lipid contact favors truncated lipid generation through Type I electron-transfer reactions rather than singlet oxygen oxidation. Organelle-specific targeting exploits this principle. Mitochondrial photodamage triggers regulated cell death through cardiolipin oxidation and cytochrome c release. Lysosomal targeting induces cathepsin release and autophagy dysfunction, often proving more effective for long-term cell killing. Dual-organelle strategies activate apoptosis, ferroptosis, and pyroptosis synergistically. These same mechanisms operate during sun exposure. Lipofuscin mediates radical chain amplification, creating a feed-forward cycle of visible light sensitivity in aging skin. Pheomelanin acts as a Type I photosensitizer generating superoxide and hydrogen peroxide under visible light, while eumelanin dissipates photon energy as heat. The amplification inherent in photoinitiated processes explains why modest light doses overwhelm antioxidant defenses, tipping redox homeostasis from eustress to distress. We translate these insights into mechanistically rational photoprotection strategies addressing visible light beyond conventional UV filters and into design principles for next-generation therapeutic photosensitizers.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.