Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42244833›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care2026

Successful treatment of refractory anaphylactic shock with angiotensin II: A case report.

Katarina Barbara Bajec, Andreja Möller Petrun

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Katarina Barbara BajecFrom the Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Management, University Medical Centre Maribor, Ljubljanska 5, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia (KBB, AMP), and Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, Taborska 8, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia (AMP).
Andreja Möller PetrunFrom the Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Management, University Medical Centre Maribor, Ljubljanska 5, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia (KBB, AMP), and Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, Taborska 8, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia (AMP).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Refractory anaphylaxis is a severe form of anaphylaxis, defined as anaphylaxis requiring ongoing treatment despite two appropriate doses of epinephrine. There is a lack of data about second-line vasopressor treatment in refractory anaphylaxis. We present a case report of refractory anaphylaxis after a young female received a gadolinium-based contrast medium and was successfully treated with an angiotensin II (ATII) infusion. ATII is converted from angiotensin I by the action of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE). Since oestrogen has an inhibitory effect upon mRNA synthesis of ACE, premenopausal women have lower ACE and ATII levels, making them more prone to anaphylaxis. There are also gene polymorphisms related to lower ATII levels in patients with severe anaphylaxis. Since ATII has no effect on mastocytes and bronchospasm, it can only be used as a second-line vasopressor beside epinephrine and fluid treatment in refractory anaphylaxis.

Identifiers

PMID42244833
PMCPMC13232898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.