ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2026
Successful use of levosimendan in managing refractory coronary vasospasm leading to recurrent cardiac arrests: a case report.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Refractory coronary artery vasospasm is a challenging condition unresponsive to standard vasodilator therapy. It can be life-threatening and precipitate arrhythmias and cardiac arrest. Levosimendan, a calcium-sensitizer and ATP-sensitive potassium channel opener, is an inodilator in acute heart failure and may offer therapeutic benefit in this setting. Case presentation: A 57-year-old man with an established diagnosis of coronary vasospasm presented with ST-elevation in the inferior leads and suffered multiple cardiac arrests, initially treated with electrical defibrillation and advanced life support measures. Angiography showed mild coronary artery disease, unchanged from the previous ones. In the intensive care unit, recurrent episodes of vasospasm persisted despite maximally tolerated medical therapy. Levosimendan was initiated at 0.2 mcg/kg/min for 24 h, leading to stabilization with no further episodes of ST-elevation and arrhythmias, and he was eventually discharged from the hospital. Conclusions: Levosimendan may be an effective rescue therapy in refractory coronary vasospasm, particularly when conventional vasodilators fail and haemodynamic instability limits escalation. Its dual action improves cardiac contractility and induces significant vasodilation, targeting key pathophysiologic processes. The presented case highlights the potential of levosimendan in stabilizing patients with refractory coronary vasospasm when conventional therapies fail. Further research and clinical trials are warranted to establish its efficacy and safety profile in a broader patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.