ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Mapping the evidence on exercise-related ventricular-arterial coupling adaptations in male adults: a scoping review.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC) integrates cardiac and vascular function and has emerged as a relevant marker of cardiovascular efficiency and adaptability. Exercise and physical activity are believed to influence VAC through multiple physiological pathways, yet the scope, methods, and consistency of available evidence remain unclear. Objective: To map and characterize the existing evidence on the relationship between exercise, physical activity, and VAC across male adult populations, assessment methods, and study designs. Methods: A scoping review was conducted in accordance with JBI methodology and reported following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Studies published between 1990 and 2025 were identified through PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Eligible studies examined VAC in male adults in relation to exercise or physical activity using invasive or non-invasive methods. Consistent with scoping review methodology, diverse study designs were included, and no formal risk-of-bias assessment was performed. Results: Eleven studies involving 2,229 participants were included. Evidence encompassed interventional, observational, and methodological studies conducted in male healthy adults, athletes, older individuals, and populations with cardiovascular risk. VAC was assessed using multiple approaches, most commonly the arterial elastance/end-systolic elastance (Ea/Ees) ratio and pulse wave velocity/global longitudinal strain (PWV/GLS). Exercise exposure ranged from acute stress testing to structured training and lifelong physical activity. Substantial heterogeneity was observed in study designs, exercise contexts, and VAC measurement techniques. Across studies, physically active and endurance-trained individuals demonstrated preserved or optimised VAC, with aerobic exercise associated with improved ventricular efficiency and reduced arterial load, while VAC remained relatively stable during acute haemodynamic stress. Conclusions: The literature relating exercise and VAC is conceptually and methodologically heterogeneous. Available evidence suggests that aerobic exercise and sustained physical activity are associated with preserved or favourable VAC profiles across male adult populations; however, causal inferences remain limited. This scoping review highlights important methodological gaps and provides a framework to guide future mechanistic and longitudinal research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.