Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42244702›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Receptive-field sizes during remapping and uniform transsaccadic updating across the visual space.

Yiming Wang, Mingsha Zhang, Ning Qian

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yiming WangSchool of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Mingsha ZhangState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Ning QianDepartment of Neuroscience and Zuckerman Institute, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5168-9379

Funding

Physiological, Computational, and Psychological Approaches to Understanding Spatial VisionR01EY032938 · NEI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI QIAN, NING · 2022 to 2025
$1.6M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY032938
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Forward receptive-field (RF) remapping, a mechanism for transsaccadic updating of retinal positions and perceptual stability, transiently changes cells' eccentricities and thus could also change their RF sizes, yet few studies examined RF sizes during remapping. A related issue is how the mechanism ensures the desired uniform updating across the visual space - a subtraction of the saccade vector from stimuli's retinal positions wherever they appear - given highly nonuniform RF sizes and cortical magnification over eccentricities. We analyzed our recent circuit model for remapping/updating after incorporating eccentricity-dependent RF sizes and found that when the corollary-discharge-gated connections achieve uniform updating in the visual space, the model predicts no change to cells' RF sizes despite their receiving inputs from other cells with different RF sizes. In contrast, if the updating were uniform in the cortical space but not visual space, cells' RF sizes would change during remapping. We analyzed the data from the lateral intraparietal area and frontal eye fields and found that remapping magnitudes are similar for cells of different eccentricities. We then confirmed the prediction that RF sizes did not change significantly during remapping. These results reveal a circuit mechanism for uniform updating and perceptual stability across the entire visual field.

Indexed as

attractor dynamicsbackward updatingcortical vs visual spaceexponentialpopulation activitiesworking memory

Identifiers

PMID42244702
PMCPMC13232280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.