Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42244246›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026

Impact of Reimbursement on the Utilisation of Gene Expression Profiles and Chemotherapy Decision-Making in Dutch Breast Cancer Patients: A Population-Based Study.

Joyce Meijer, Nienke Hermanns, Rhodé Bijlsma, Hedwig M Blommestein, Desiree H J G van den Bongard, Thijs van Dalen, Paul J van Diest, Caroline A Drukker, Cristina Guerrero Paez, Aafke H Honkoop and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Joyce MeijerDepartment of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7327-5916
Nienke HermannsDepartment of Health Technology and Services Research, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
Rhodé BijlsmaDivision of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0980-6652
Hedwig M BlommesteinErasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5846-0531
Desiree H J G van den BongardDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5549-324X
Thijs van DalenDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0882-9086
Paul J van DiestDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0658-2745
Caroline A DrukkerDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3477-5499
Cristina Guerrero PaezDutch Breast Cancer Society (BVN), Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Aafke H HonkoopDepartment of Medical Oncology, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
Agnes JagerDepartment of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Linetta B KoppertDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1944-6777
Sabine C LinnDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5541-0347
Marissa C van MaarenDepartment of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5708-2559
Ester J SiemerinkDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente, Hengelo, the Netherlands.
Laura J van 'tUniversity of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9838-8298
José H VoldersDepartment of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9190-4579
Marie Jeanne Vrancken PeetersDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4472-4257
Sabine SieslingDepartment of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0273-824X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined gene expression profile (GEP) use in relation to reimbursement policies and chemotherapy administration, both for patients with and without GEP indication. Women aged ≥ 18-69 years and diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer between January 2011 and June 2024 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. GEP use in relation to reimbursement policies and GEP result in relation to chemotherapy administration was analysed using flowcharts and a trend line. For patients with GEP indication, logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine if the reimbursement periods influenced the GEP use, and GEP use was analysed per region in the Netherlands and incidence year using trend lines. In total, 138,765 patients were included. Among 17,525 patients with GEP indication, proportions of patients who received a GEP were higher during retrospective reimbursement (25%) and publicly known reimbursement (37%) compared with no reimbursement (9%) and differed across regions in the Netherlands. Proportions of patients who did not receive chemotherapy were higher for patients who had a low-risk MammaPrint (93%) or Oncotype DX (97%) result compared with patients who had a high-risk MammaPrint (17%) or Oncotype DX (15%) result. Among 13,003 patients with GEP indication who did not receive GEP, 52% did receive chemotherapy. Approximately one-third of patients who met GEP criteria and were eligible for publicly known reimbursement received a GEP. Appropriate follow-up steps and further research seem required to analyse reasons for not ordering a GEP in times of reimbursement, since GEP results help chemotherapy decision-making.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsGene Expression ProfilingInsurance, Health, ReimbursementTranscriptomeAdolescentAdultAgedDecision MakingFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNetherlandsRegistriesRetrospective StudiesYoung Adultbreast cancerchemotherapygene expression profilepopulation‐basedreimbursement

Identifiers

PMID42244246
PMCPMC13595471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.