ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026
Impact of Reimbursement on the Utilisation of Gene Expression Profiles and Chemotherapy Decision-Making in Dutch Breast Cancer Patients: A Population-Based Study.
Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examined gene expression profile (GEP) use in relation to reimbursement policies and chemotherapy administration, both for patients with and without GEP indication. Women aged ≥ 18-69 years and diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer between January 2011 and June 2024 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. GEP use in relation to reimbursement policies and GEP result in relation to chemotherapy administration was analysed using flowcharts and a trend line. For patients with GEP indication, logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine if the reimbursement periods influenced the GEP use, and GEP use was analysed per region in the Netherlands and incidence year using trend lines. In total, 138,765 patients were included. Among 17,525 patients with GEP indication, proportions of patients who received a GEP were higher during retrospective reimbursement (25%) and publicly known reimbursement (37%) compared with no reimbursement (9%) and differed across regions in the Netherlands. Proportions of patients who did not receive chemotherapy were higher for patients who had a low-risk MammaPrint (93%) or Oncotype DX (97%) result compared with patients who had a high-risk MammaPrint (17%) or Oncotype DX (15%) result. Among 13,003 patients with GEP indication who did not receive GEP, 52% did receive chemotherapy. Approximately one-third of patients who met GEP criteria and were eligible for publicly known reimbursement received a GEP. Appropriate follow-up steps and further research seem required to analyse reasons for not ordering a GEP in times of reimbursement, since GEP results help chemotherapy decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.