Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42244244›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2026

A Visual Behavioral Training Study of Categorical Face Pattern Recognition in Mice.

Yanhong Chen, Lingna Guo, Ri Jiang, Ke Zhou, Xudong Zhao, Ming Meng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yanhong ChenDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Lingna GuoState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Science and Mental Health, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Ri JiangState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Science and Mental Health, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Ke ZhouDepartment of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Xudong ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Science and Mental Health, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Ming MengDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32371100Research Center for Brain Cognition and Human Development, Guangdong, China 2024B0303390003Sino-German Center for Research Promotion M-0705STI2030-Major Projects 2021ZD0204200Striving for the First-Class, Improving Weak Links and Highlighting Features (SIH) Key Discipline for Psychology in South China Normal University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Can rodents form a categorical face concept or is their ability to discriminate faces from objects driven solely by visual features? To answer this question, we trained C57BL/6J mice on a touchscreen face-object discrimination task and examined their behavior in two experiments. We show that: (i) after training, mice generalized face-object classification to novel exemplars but lost the ability to discriminate when stimuli were inverted or contrast‑negated, consistent with the classic effects of these manipulations on humans performing categorically face-specific tasks; (ii) along a continuum from low‑similarity pareidolia to real faces, choice performance followed a sigmoidal rather than a linear or quadratic function, which again suggests a categorical face concept recognition boundary. These behavioral results in mice resemble how humans visually categorize faces and nonfaces. The work provides evidence that a face concept can emerge even in a species whose social communication is not primarily visual, paving the way for future investigations on neural and genetic substrates of categorical pattern recognition.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalFacial RecognitionPattern Recognition, VisualAnimalsFaceHumansMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPhotic Stimulationanimal behaviorconcept categorizationcontrast negationface pareidoliainversion effectmouse vision

Identifiers

PMID42244244
PMCPMC13238314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.