ArticleAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2026
A Visual Behavioral Training Study of Categorical Face Pattern Recognition in Mice.
Article in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Can rodents form a categorical face concept or is their ability to discriminate faces from objects driven solely by visual features? To answer this question, we trained C57BL/6J mice on a touchscreen face-object discrimination task and examined their behavior in two experiments. We show that: (i) after training, mice generalized face-object classification to novel exemplars but lost the ability to discriminate when stimuli were inverted or contrast‑negated, consistent with the classic effects of these manipulations on humans performing categorically face-specific tasks; (ii) along a continuum from low‑similarity pareidolia to real faces, choice performance followed a sigmoidal rather than a linear or quadratic function, which again suggests a categorical face concept recognition boundary. These behavioral results in mice resemble how humans visually categorize faces and nonfaces. The work provides evidence that a face concept can emerge even in a species whose social communication is not primarily visual, paving the way for future investigations on neural and genetic substrates of categorical pattern recognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.