ArticlePhysiological reports2026
Physiological adaptation during heart rate variability biofeedback in young adults: A survival analysis in high-stress academic environments.
Article in Physiological reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Medical education is a high-demand environment where stress may disrupt autonomic and HPA-axis regulation. We examined symptom trajectories and adaptation during heart rate variability biofeedback (HRV-BF) in an academic setting. Forty-seven students were followed for ~3 months. The intervention group completed HRV-BF twice weekly (~30 min/session). Psychological outcomes (PSS, SAS, BAI, BDI) were assessed at baseline and follow-up, with clinically meaningful improvement defined as a ≥ 20% reduction. HRV/coherence indices were analyzed with mixed-effects models, and cortisol and secretory IgA were measured around Maastricht Acute Stress Test before and after training. Within the HRV-BF group, perceived stress, anxiety, and depression declined by May (all p < 0.001; d≈1.28-1.86), although between-group differences converged. Meaningful improvement was more frequent in HRV-BF group across scales. Acute sessions increased coherence and inter-beat interval and reduced heart rate (p ≤ 0.015), while RMSSD and inter-beat interval gains plateaued after ~14 sessions. Cortisol responses to stress differed after training, whereas sIgA showed no between-group effects. In this nonrandomized study, HRV-BF was associated with clinically meaningful improvement by follow-up and autonomic adaptation; however, because the group was not matched on baseline distress severity and no sham comparator was used, reductions in anxiety and depression cannot be attributed definitively to the intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.