ArticleJournal of environmental quality
Integrated assessment of corrosion behaviour in drinking water distribution systems using experimental analysis, machine learning, and a unified corrosion-scaling index.
Article in Journal of environmental quality. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Corrosion and scaling in drinking water distribution systems negatively affects the pipe lifespan, water quality, and cost of maintenance. Empirical corrosion and scaling indices are derived based on physicochemical water parameters. Each of these indices comes from different chemical assumptions and interpretation ranges. They provide conflicting results for the same sample of water. This study employed a hybrid methodology integrating experimental investigation, statistical analysis, and machine learning modeling toward enhanced evaluation of corrosion. Water samples were collected during an extended monitoring period from a real, running drinking water distribution system and analysed for their physicochemical properties. Corrosion rate determination was performed experimentally by the weight-loss method; an entropy-weighted water quality index was also calculated. The results were validated against the experimentally taken corrosion rate. A gradient boosting machine learning (extreme gradient boosting) model was used. It predicted the corrosion behavior with high accuracy. To resolve the inconsistency problem between individual indices, a unified corrosion-scaling index (UCSI) is developed by normalising all of them to a common scale for corrosion tendency and then averaging their values into a single, easily interpretable metric. This index provides each water sample a clear corrosive, neutral, or scale-forming classification. UCSI exhibited stable and consistent classification across both training datasets (neutral or borderline: 42.12%-50.76%, scale-forming: 25.76%-36.36%, and corrosive: 21.52%-23.48%) and testing datasets (neutral or borderline: 44.52%-45.45%, scale-forming: 39.39%-39.42%, and corrosive: 15.16%-16.06%). These results show close agreement between the observed and model-predicted results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.