Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42244134›Full record

Trial reportActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2026

Introducing self-sampling for cervical cancer screening: A regional implementation study in Pirkanmaa, Finland.

Saara Kyllönen, Satu Saloranta, Saara Kares, Anu Mustila, Karolina Louvanto

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06931184 (Self-Sampling In Cervical Cancer Routine Screening), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06931184 naenrolling by invitationnot on this map

Self-Sampling In Cervical Cancer Routine Screening (FALCON)

TypeinterventionalSponsorTampere University HospitalRan2024 to 2029Enrolled40,000ConditionsCervical Cancer ScreeningArmsself-sampling
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Saara KyllönenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6643-3916
Satu SalorantaFimlab Laboratories, Tampere, Finland.
Saara KaresFimlab Laboratories, Tampere, Finland.
Anu MustilaFimlab Laboratories, Tampere, Finland.
Karolina LouvantoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1172-363X

Funding

Roche DiagnosticsSigrid Juséliuksen SäätiöState funding for University-level Health Research, Tampere University Hospital, Wellbeing Services County of PirkanmaaSyöpäsäätiö (Cancer Foundation Finland)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHPV primary testing is the preferred method for cervical cancer screening worldwide and enables vaginal self-sampling at home. Self-sampling performs comparably to clinician-collected samples and can improve participation, especially among non-attenders. In Finland, self-sampling has so far been piloted in the Helsinki region. This study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of self-sampling in Pirkanmaa, providing a representative model of implementation outside the capital region. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe self-sampling in cervical cancer routine screening (FALCON) study (NCT06931184) targeted women living in Pirkanmaa who did not respond to the initial cervical cancer screening invitation. In a reminder letter, they were offered an opt-in model self-sampling option. Participants ordered a self-sampling kit containing a FLOQSwab (Copan), instructions, and a prepaid return envelope. Samples were analyzed with the Roche Cobas 4800 HPV assay at Fimlab Laboratories. HPV-positive women were referred for cytology testing and managed according to national guidelines. Participants completed two online questionnaires: one at kit order and another 60 days later.

resultsOf 16 289 reminder letters, 329 kits were ordered, and 304 (1.9%) samples were returned. Participants (mean age 48 [range 29.9-65.8]) were mostly well-educated with previous screening history. Time-saving, reduced discomfort, and lower embarrassment were the main reasons for choosing home-sampling. HPV was detected in 6.9% of the samples, with one case of histological HSIL identified. Most participants found self-sampling easy and comfortable, and nearly all would recommend it to others.

conclusionDespite the small number of participants in this first year, the study offers early evidence of the strong acceptability and practicality of self-sampling among women in Pirkanmaa, warranting further evaluation at a larger scale.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerPapillomavirus InfectionsSelf CareSpecimen HandlingUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaginal SmearsAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleFinlandHumansMiddle AgedPatient Acceptance of Health Carecervical cancer screeningHPV self‐samplingscreening attendance

Identifiers

PMID42244134
PMCPMC13394148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.