Trial reportActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2026
Introducing self-sampling for cervical cancer screening: A regional implementation study in Pirkanmaa, Finland.
Trial report in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06931184 (Self-Sampling In Cervical Cancer Routine Screening), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Self-Sampling In Cervical Cancer Routine Screening (FALCON)
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Methodological considerations in the implementation of HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionHPV primary testing is the preferred method for cervical cancer screening worldwide and enables vaginal self-sampling at home. Self-sampling performs comparably to clinician-collected samples and can improve participation, especially among non-attenders. In Finland, self-sampling has so far been piloted in the Helsinki region. This study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of self-sampling in Pirkanmaa, providing a representative model of implementation outside the capital region. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe self-sampling in cervical cancer routine screening (FALCON) study (NCT06931184) targeted women living in Pirkanmaa who did not respond to the initial cervical cancer screening invitation. In a reminder letter, they were offered an opt-in model self-sampling option. Participants ordered a self-sampling kit containing a FLOQSwab (Copan), instructions, and a prepaid return envelope. Samples were analyzed with the Roche Cobas 4800 HPV assay at Fimlab Laboratories. HPV-positive women were referred for cytology testing and managed according to national guidelines. Participants completed two online questionnaires: one at kit order and another 60 days later.
resultsOf 16 289 reminder letters, 329 kits were ordered, and 304 (1.9%) samples were returned. Participants (mean age 48 [range 29.9-65.8]) were mostly well-educated with previous screening history. Time-saving, reduced discomfort, and lower embarrassment were the main reasons for choosing home-sampling. HPV was detected in 6.9% of the samples, with one case of histological HSIL identified. Most participants found self-sampling easy and comfortable, and nearly all would recommend it to others.
conclusionDespite the small number of participants in this first year, the study offers early evidence of the strong acceptability and practicality of self-sampling among women in Pirkanmaa, warranting further evaluation at a larger scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.