Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42244119›Full record

ArticleThe journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research2026

Delivery Outcomes in the First 3 Years Following the Clinical Introduction of the Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert in Japan.

Keisuke Nakajima, Takeshi Nagamatsu, Hiroaki Tanaka, Shigetaka Matsunaga, Shintaro Makino, Hiroaki Itoh, Yoshiki Kudo, Atsuo Itakura, Perinatal committee of the Japanese Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Keisuke NakajimaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7926-8625
Takeshi NagamatsuDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1480-5785
Hiroaki TanakaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mie University School of Medicine, Tsu, Mie, Japan.
Shigetaka MatsunagaCenter for Maternal, Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Saitama Medical University, Tsu, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2592-9951
Shintaro MakinoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroaki ItohDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan.
Yoshiki KudoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
Atsuo ItakuraDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4554-164X
Perinatal committee of the Japanese Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate utilization patterns, safety, and delivery outcomes associated with the recently introduced dinoprostone vaginal insert in Japan using multicenter real-world data.

methodsThis two-stage nationwide survey targeted training institutions certified by the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology. An online questionnaire was sent to 690 institutions to identify facilities eligible for secondary data collection. Participating institutions submitted clinical information for up to 25 consecutive cases in which labor was induced with the insert between January and December 2021. Patient characteristics, insert use, delivery outcomes, and adverse events were summarized. In nulliparas, two subgroup comparisons were conducted: (1) those achieving cervical ripening with the insert alone (P) versus those requiring subsequent mechanical ripening (P to M), and (2) those receiving mechanical ripening before the insert (M to P) versus those receiving the insert first (P to M).

resultsOf 973 registered cases from 69 institutions, 947 were eligible for analysis. Nulliparous women accounted for 74.8%. The cesarean section rate was 30.7% overall (36.3% in nulliparas; 14.2% in multiparas). Median time from insert initiation to delivery was 31.6 h. Uterine tachysystole occurred in 18.1% and fetal heart rate abnormalities in 15.8%, but timely management prevented serious outcomes. In subgroup analyses, nulliparas ripened with the insert alone demonstrated shorter induction-to-delivery intervals, lower cesarean and oxytocin-use rates, but more tachysystole. Among cases requiring both methods, the order of ripening techniques did not affect vaginal delivery success.

conclusionThis first multicenter real-world evaluation demonstrates that the insert is effective and generally safe for cervical ripening and labor induction in Japan.

Indexed as

Cervical RipeningDelivery, ObstetricDinoprostoneLabor, InducedOxytocicsAdministration, IntravaginalAdultCesarean SectionFemaleHumansJapanPregnancyDinoprostoneOxytocicscervical ripeningdinoprostonelabor inductionmechanical methodsreal‐world evidence

Identifiers

PMID42244119
PMCPMC13238380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.