ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
Predicting enhancer-promoter interactions using a stacking-based ensemble strategy.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationEnhancer-promoter interactions (EPIs) are essential for gene regulation and disease progression. Recent studies have shown that distal enhancers can regulate target genes through interactions with nearby promoters, providing important insights into transcriptional regulation mechanisms. Although high-throughput experimental techniques have enabled large-scale identification of EPIs, these methods are often costly and time-consuming. In addition, existing computational approaches still face challenges in effectively integrating heterogeneous feature representations from different cell lines.
resultsWe propose a stacked ensemble framework for EPI prediction that integrates feature representations from diverse cell line datasets using multiple machine learning algorithms. The extracted complementary patterns are further combined by an XGBoost classifier to improve robustness against overfitting. Experiments on six independent datasets show that the proposed method achieves superior accuracy and generalization compared with existing EPI prediction models, with an average AUROC of 0.909 while maintaining computational efficiency. AVAILABILITY: The source code and its archived release are available at GitHub and Zenodo. The Zenodo archive provides a versioned snapshot of the repository: https://zenodo.org/records/19952998.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.