Observational studyThe Journal of dermatology2026
Real-World Maintenance of Remission in Atopic Dermatitis Patients With Upadacitinib: A Multicenter Retrospective Study in Japan (ROADMAP Study).
Observational study in The Journal of dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Upadacitinib (UPA) is a selective Janus kinase 1 inhibitor that improves moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, but real-world strategies to maintain remission after response remain unclear. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study in Japan of 219 patients aged ≥ 12 years who achieved protocol-defined remission, defined as Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) 0/1 at two visits ≥ 4 weeks apart during UPA treatment. Patients were classified as on-label (continuous daily 15 or 30 mg), spacing/reduction (extension of the dosing interval and/or dose-reduction after remission), or discontinuation (stopping UPA after remission). The primary endpoint was maintenance of remission over 48 weeks; secondary endpoints were time to relapse, outcomes after treatment modification, remission at 72 weeks after ≥ 24 weeks of sustained remission, and safety. Because the analysis was restricted to responders who achieved remission, generalizability to all UPA-treated patients is limited. Seventy-five percent of patients achieved IGA 0/1 within about 4 months of starting UPA. Over the subsequent 48 weeks, 127/200 (63.5%, 95% CI 56.6-69.9) maintained IGA 0/1. When stratified by post-remission dosing strategy (n = 193; excluding 7 who switched to other systemic therapy), remission at 48 weeks was maintained in 93/145 (64.1%, 95% CI 55.8-71.9) in the on-label group, 24/32 (75.0%, 95% CI 56.6-88.5) in the spacing/reduction group, and 6/16 (37.5%, 95% CI 15.2-64.6) in the discontinuation group. Among patients with ≥ 24 weeks of sustained remission, week-72 IGA 0/1 maintenance rates were 70.7% (95% CI 60.7-79.1; n = 107), 100% (95% CI 63.1-100.0; n = 8), and 60.0% (95% CI 20.0-90.0; n = 5) in the on-label, spacing/reduction, and discontinuation groups, respectively; estimates for spacing/reduction and discontinuation were imprecise due to small sample sizes. Longer on-label treatment before tapering or discontinuation tended to be associated with a lower relapse risk. UPA showed a safety profile consistent with previous studies. Acne, herpes simplex, herpes zoster, and folliculitis were the most frequent adverse events, and most were mild and manageable, although one herpes zoster case required temporary interruption. In this responder-enriched real-world Japanese cohort, UPA induced remission in most patients within 4 months and allowed approximately two-thirds to maintain remission over 48 weeks. Observed outcomes suggest that maintaining on-label dosing and cautious spacing/reduction after sustained remission may help preserve disease control, whereas discontinuation may be associated with a higher risk of relapse; however, comparisons between dosing strategies are descriptive and hypothesis-generating. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.