ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2026
The Clinical Pathway Initiative: Identifying role relevant competencies in genomic pathways.
Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mainstreaming genomic medicine creates the challenge of ensuring confidence and competence in the healthcare workforce. The Clinical Pathway Initiative (CPI), led by the NHS Genomics Education Programme, maps competencies and educational resources to clinical pathways where genomics is used to deliver care. This approach supports integration of genomic medicine through a consistent, workforce-agnostic, competency-based framework. Using a familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) clinical pathway, we conducted a process evaluation to assess the usefulness, usability, and acceptability of the CPI in both development and implementation. Quantitative data were collected via rating scales and a modified System Usability Scale (SUS), while qualitative data were generated from interviews and short-answer survey questions with participants, including a range of professional roles and individuals involved in both development and implementation. SUS scores were 65 for development and 72.5 for implementation (68 or higher is above average). Overall, participants recognized the initiative's value in supporting workforce competence. Interviewees highlighted its simplicity, transferability, and role in promoting consistent, high-level genomic standards. These findings support ongoing refinement and evaluation of the CPI in real-world practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.