Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42244079›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering2026

Investigation of Contrast Retention in PCOM Aneurysms as a Possible Marker for Instability and Rupture.

Laurel M M Marsh, Fernando Mut, Alireza Chitsaz, Rainald Lohner, Anne M Robertson, Naoki Kaneko, Juan R Cebral

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laurel M M MarshDepartment of Bioengineering, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0994-2646
Fernando MutDepartment of Bioengineering, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA.
Alireza ChitsazDepartment of Bioengineering, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-2531-6498
Rainald LohnerDepartment of Physics, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0083-5131
Anne M RobertsonDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Material Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5063-4293
Naoki KanekoDepartment of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Juan R CebralDepartment of Bioengineering, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia, USA.

Funding

NIH HHS R01 NS097457-10NIH HHS R01 NS121286-05Travis C. Valentine Memorial Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification of cerebral aneurysms at risk of destabilization and rupture remains challenging. Although flow stagnation has been recognized as a risk factor, the underlying mechanisms and its predictive power are poorly understood. The purpose was to investigate possible associations between flow stagnation determined from computational fluid dynamics (CFD)-based virtual angiograms and aneurysm instability and rupture. A total of 312 aneurysms at the posterior communicating (PCOM) artery were analyzed with image-based CFD. Virtual angiograms were constructed by simulating contrast injections, and contrast retention metrics were calculated from time density curves of the aneurysm and their parent artery. These metrics were compared between 23 stable and 18 unstable aneurysms from a longitudinal dataset and between 129 unruptured and 142 ruptured aneurysms from a cross-sectional dataset. Aneurysmal contrast retention was significantly larger (p < 0.05) in ruptured compared to unruptured aneurysms as well as when considering only small aneurysms (size < 7 mm). Similar associations were obtained when comparing stable and growing aneurysms. Multivariate analysis showed that aneurysm instability can be forecasted from flow stagnation with good accuracy (AUC = 0.88), while aneurysm rupture with only moderate accuracy (AUC = 0.72) or marginal accuracy for small aneurysms (AUC = 0.66). Mean residence time was identified as a good predictor of aneurysm instability and rupture. Flow stagnation, determined by contrast retention in angiographies (virtual or real), is associated with PCOM aneurysm instability (growth or symptoms development) and can be used to identify aneurysms prone to further growth and potentially rupture. However, aneurysms can also rupture without exhibiting signs of flow stagnation.

Indexed as

Aneurysm, RupturedContrast MediaIntracranial AneurysmCerebral AngiographyFemaleHumansHydrodynamicsContrast Mediacerebral aneurysms statuscomputational hemodynamicsflow stagnationvirtual angiography

Identifiers

PMID42244079
PMCPMC13238323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.