ArticleThe Medical journal of Australia2026
Impact of Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Implementation on Rates and Characteristics of People Seeing Multiple Prescribers in Primary Care: A Controlled Interrupted Time-Series Analysis.
Article in The Medical journal of Australia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo examine changes in rates of primary care patients seeing multiple prescribers and characteristics of patients who ceased seeing multiple prescribers for monitored medicines after voluntary implementation of the Victorian prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP). STUDY
designControlled interrupted time series analysis of primary care electronic medical records.
settingA total of 562 general practices across three Victorian healthcare networks (Monash Health, Peninsula Health, Eastern Health). PATIENTS: People prescribed at least one PDMP-monitored medicine (e.g., opioids, benzodiazepines) and/or non-monitored psychotropic medicines (e.g., antidepressants, antipsychotics) between 1 January 2017 and 30 June 2023.
interventionVoluntary (1 April 2019) and mandatory (1 April 2020) implementation of the Victorian PDMP.
main outcome measuresChanges in the monthly rate of people seeing multiple prescribers (defined as four or more prescribers) following PDMP implementation for monitored medicines, with non-monitored medicines used as a control; characteristics of people who ceased seeing multiple prescribers for monitored medicines following PDMP implementation.
resultsFollowing voluntary PDMP implementation (1 April 2019), there was a significant reduction in the differential step and trend changes in the rates of seeing multiple prescribers between people prescribed monitored and non-monitored medicines (differential step change: β, -3.55 [95% confidence interval (CI), -5.08 to -2.03]; differential trend change: β, -0.29 [95% CI, -0.46 to -0.12]). Following mandatory PDMP implementation (1 April 2020), there was no significant step change difference. However, there was an increase in the differential trend change in the rate of seeing multiple prescribers between those prescribed monitored and non-monitored medicines (differential trend change: β, 0.21 [95% CI, 0.05-0.37]; p = 0.009). Logistic regression revealed that older age (95% CI, 1.39-1.75), male gender (95% CI, 1.09-1.25), metropolitan residence (95% CI, 1.04 and 1.23) and substance use disorder diagnosis (95% CI, 1.07-1.28) were associated with significantly higher odds of seeing multiple prescribers before PDMP implementation.
conclusionsImplementation of the PDMP was associated with meaningful reductions in people accessing monitored medicines from four or more prescribers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.