Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42244015›Full record

ReviewJournal of ovarian research2026

Safety assessment of autologous ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation in cancer patients: an updated review.

Luyao Wang, Yifan Chu, Jiaxin Xie, Jiayun Chen, Yetan Liu, Shulin Yang, Ying Zhang, Jing Yue

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of ovarian research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Luyao WangReproductive Medicine and Genetics Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Yifan ChuReproductive Medicine and Genetics Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Jiaxin XieReproductive Medicine and Genetics Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Jiayun ChenReproductive Medicine and Genetics Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Yetan LiuReproductive Medicine and Genetics Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Shulin YangReproductive Medicine and Genetics Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Ying ZhangHubei Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Medicine, Shiyan, People's Republic of China.
Jing YueReproductive Medicine and Genetics Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People's Republic of China. jingyue8@hotmail.com.

Funding

the Open Project of Hubei Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Medicine 2025RMOF005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, the global incidence of malignant tumors has been increasing with a notable trend toward younger patients, representing a major public health challenge. Fertility preservation has emerged as a key issue at the intersection of oncology and reproductive medicine. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantation (OTCT) offers a unique and valuable strategy, particularly for prepubertal girls and patients requiring immediate gonadotoxic therapy. Although OTCT can effectively restore ovarian endocrine function and fertility, its clinical application is largely limited by safety concerns, especially the potential risk of reintroducing viable malignant cells via transplanted ovarian tissue. Therefore, accurate detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) in cryopreserved ovarian tissue and effective tumor cell decontamination strategies are essential to ensure clinical safety. In addition, long-term follow-up data on the health status of offspring born after OTCT remain insufficient. This narrative review systematically summarizes the safety concerns of OTCT, focusing on cancer-specific ovarian tissue contamination risks, current MRD detection and purging techniques, as well as the intergenerational safety of offspring. Based on recent evidence, this review can further provide key conclusions and practical recommendations for the safety assessment of OTCT, with the aim of promoting the safe, standardized, and widespread clinical application of this technique.

Indexed as

CryopreservationFertility PreservationNeoplasmsOvaryFemaleHumansNeoplasm, ResidualOvarian NeoplasmsTransplantation, AutologousFertility preservationMalignant contaminationMinimal residual diseaseOvarian tissue cryopreservation and transplantationSafety

Identifiers

PMID42244015
PMCPMC13459637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.